Schools to teach lessons of marriage
Karen Peterson, USA Today
Add a fourth "R" for relationships to reading, 'riting and
'rithmetic.
When the Florida Legislature in May passed the nation's first
law requiring that all high schoolers be taught marital and
relationships skills, the state took the lead in a burgeoning but
controversial movement.
The growing push is the result of a new body of research that
suggests specific interpersonal skills could lower the divorce rate
for the next generation - a generation that does not want to repeat
the mistakes of its parents. Zealous advocates believe this
knowledge should be taught to teens and even preteens in
school.
"Florida's move is landmark and visionary," says Diane Sollee,
founder of the Coalition for Marriage, Family and Couples
Education. Her "Smart Marriages: Happy Families" conference, which
concluded Sunday in Arlington, Va., spotlighted the trend. The
newest courses will help students know "marriage is not a helpless
crapshoot," she says. "If we've got this new information, we have
an obligation to make it available to future generations."
Experts still predict at least one in four new marriages will
end in divorce. Some teachers and students, from Pennsylvania to
Oklahoma and South Dakota, are enthusiastic about courses that
could affect the statistics.
Claremore, Okla., counselor Phyllis Hess decided her school
needed something new when she heard a teen-ager outlining her
life's plan. "She said she would go to college, get married, get
divorced and then get married again," Hess says. "That spoke
volumes to me: We need to teach a new foundation for living."
Lynn Dixon teaches a course called Partners to high schoolers in
Philadelphia. She could have used the course herself, she says. "I
married the same man twice and divorced him twice. I was a victim
of poetry about marriage. This course gives a pragmatic look at
couplehood; love does not flow like a river. "
Eighteen-year-old Styvens George met his girlfriend in Dixon's
classroom. "I learned one person has to be a listener," George
says. "The course helped me not be competitive about winning. I'm
not just trying to get my point across."
His girlfriend, Kimberly Jackson, 17, took the course partly
because her parents have divorced. "I wanted to see what marriage
was going to be like," she says. But skeptics are also speaking up.
"Schools are not in the business of guaranteeing happy marriages,"
says Donna Fowler of the American Federation of Teachers. "These
courses may be fine, but there is not enough time to do an adequate
job of teaching math, reading and science. Loading this stuff on
teachers is ridiculous."
Others wonder about the training of teachers and whether such
courses - which vary in length, focus and demands on instructors -
are actually effective.
Many schools around the country already teach some form of
family life course. But Sollee and others say the majority don't
measure up. Cutting-edge programs present the newest research,
including specific communication techniques, the behaviors most
likely to cause divorce, rules for settling conflict and the
importance of family patterns in problem solving.
Existing programs are being modified, some to reach ever-younger
children. New programs rolling out include:
Pairs for Peers by family therapists Morris and Lori Gordon.
Based on landmark courses for adults, programs will be launched
nationally for middle and high school students this fall.
Building Relationships: Skills for a Lifetime, co-authored by
researcher David Olson. For ages 13 to 18, the course will be ready
by September. Olson's two pioneering programs, for engaged couples
and those already married, have been used by more than 1 million in
eight countries.
EQ (Social-Emotional Intelligence), from psychologist Mo Therese
Hannah. In development to teach relationship-building skills to
those in kindergarten to eighth grade. A full range of materials
will be available later this year.
On Aug. 2, about 50 interested teachers from throughout South
Dakota will be trained to teach Connections: Relationships and
Marriage, a campaign spearheaded by Scott Gardner of South Dakota
State University. Connections was developed by a teacher, Char
Kamper, with backing from the private, nonprofit Dibble Fund.
Some of the most vocal advocates of new courses are judges and
lawyers disillusioned by the carnage they have seen in court. Judge
Dynda Post of Oklahoma's 12th Judicial District says: "Many kids in
Oklahoma just get married too young. And the younger you marry, the
fewer skills you have." With funding in part from the Family Law
section of the Oklahoma Bar Association, she is part of a
grass-roots network seeking separate relationships courses for
younger and older Oklahoma students.
Lynne Gold-Bikin is a divorced divorce lawyer who wants to put
herself out of business. Divorce lawyers "know more about what
breaks up marriages than anybody." Working with Pairs materials and
funding from the American Bar Association, Gold-Bikin launched
Partners in 1994 based on "communications skills, life skills and
the law. . . . This is not touchy-feely stuff. This is real life."
Partners is in 31 states.
Students stress they learn as much about themselves as about
relationships. "You learn what you are inside," says Luke Hsu, 17,
who took Connections in Redlands, Calif. "Most of the time you put
on a fake face in public just to impress others."
Defenders of skills-based marital and relationships training
stress that the lessons learned can be applied in a wide arena,
with parents, siblings, teachers, peers and bosses.
Student Ashley Foreman, 16, of Wood Dale, Ill., agrees after
taking Pairs for Peers. "You can go through your life being totally
smart. . . . but if you don't have people skills, you won't get the
job. But you have to be with people no matter where you go. You
need to have things go smoothly instead of having all these little
fights."
Critics, however, suggest such courses may be only marginally
useful. Any teacher who can help a child communicate more
effectively is "giving a child a gift," "Under stress, children
will handle aggression and anger primarily the way the people who
raised them did," says SaraKay Smullens, a Philadelphia marriage
and family therapist. A teacher can teach that patterns of
communication can be altered, "but they will have to work very hard
to change them."
She is also concerned that teachers who may be given no training
at all may not be prepared to deal with possible emotional fallout.
Teachers should be able to "consult continuously with a trained
therapist who understands the complexity of childhood
development."
Although there is much positive, anecdotal feedback from
teachers and students, Diane Sollee says as yet there is little
scientific research supporting skills-based marital and
relationships training in schools.
Some discouraging news came recently from pioneering researcher
John Gottman, who found that in the middle of an argument even
happily married couples cannot always use techniques for fighting
fair.
Some analysis is on the way. California State University San
Bernardino and South Dakota State University will independently
evaluate results of the Connections program, now used in 20
states.
Developed at Boston University with a federal grant, "The Art of
Loving Well" is now used in 47 states. A government-sponsored study
of eighth-graders during field tests of the course found that 8%
became sexually active during the school year after the course; 28%
of a control group did.
Sollee stresses that most courses have nothing to do with sex
education and are nonsectarian. The courses can be used, of course,
in many places that feature religion, including church and
community groups.
Most in the relationships movement say that what they teach is
more relevant than many current courses. "There is a lot of
learning in schools today that does not contribute to what students
do in their daily lives," researcher David Olson says. "These
interpersonal skills they will use for the rest of their
lives."
By Karen S. Peterson, USA TODAY copyright - all rights
reserved.