Take a Vow to Promote Benefits of
Marriage
Wade Horn
November 2, 1999
The Washington Times
As president of the National Fatherhood Initiative, I have spent
much of the last six years promoting the importance of
responsible fatherhood. During that time, I've discovered two
things.
First, there is an increasing receptiveness to the idea that
fathers matter and more needs to be done to support and encourage
responsible fatherhood. Second, there is a continuing and
deep reluctance to support married fatherhood as the
ideal.
Discussing marriage as the ideal or even preferred family
structure is difficult for several reasons. First, marriage is a
deeply personal issue. In any given audience
(including, I assume, the readers of this column), one can
safely assume that at least 40% of the adults are divorced. Many
others will either have parents who are divorced, a spouse
who is from a divorced family, or children who are
divorced.
When adults who have been touched by divorce hear others suggest
that marriage is the "best" or "ideal" situation, they often
interpret this as a personal rebuke. Nobody likes to be
told that their situation is somehow "second best."
Second, some have bought into the notion of family relativism;
the idea that all family structures are inherently equal,
with no consequences for children (or adults) except,
perhaps, for the greater propensity of single parent families
to be poor. Indeed, this argument goes, if we solve the
economic disadvantage of single parent households, there will be no
ill effects of growing up in a home without two, married
parents.
Third, some simply don't like marriage. They either see marriage
promotion as a rationale for withdrawing support from single
mothers or as means to re-assert male patriarchy and
dominance over women. To such folks, marriage promotion is
not just foolish, but downright dangerous.
The empirical literature is quite clear, however, that children
do, indeed, do best when they grow up in an intact, two-parent,
married household. Even after controlling for differences in
income, children who live with their married parents
are two times less likely to fail at school, two to three
times less likely to suffer an emotional or behavioral
problem requiring psychiatric treatment, perhaps as much as 20
times less likely o suffer child abuse, and as
adolescents they are less likely to get into trouble with the law,
use illicit drugs, smoke cigarettes, abuse alcohol, or
engage in early and promiscuous sexual activity. One is hard
pressed to find a single indicator of child well-being which is not
adversely impacted by divorce or being born
out-of-wedlock.
The empirical evidence also is quite clear that adults -- women
as well as men -- are happier, healthier, and wealthier
than their single counterparts. And communities with high
concentrations of married households are safer than
those with substantially fewer married households.
Of course, some married households, especially where
domestic violence and child abuse are present, are
horrible places for both children and adults. But contrary to
the stereotypes perpetuated by the media and some
advocacy groups, the reality is that domestic violence and child
abuse are substantially less likely to occur in intact
households than in any other family arrangement. The truth is
the most dangerous place for women and children is a
household where mom is cohabiting with a man who isn't
biologically related to the children.
Given that marriage is so important to the well-being of
children, adults, and communities, how do we overcome our
reluctance to talk about it? By putting children back
at the center of things.
Adults have been spending far too much time arguing among
themselves about the virtues of marriage and far too little
time helping our children understand why marriage is
important and how to form and sustain healthy marriages. Yet,
national surveys consistently show that our young, far
from rejecting marriage as an ideal, desperately want to
avoid the serial marriages and high divorce rates of their
elders. It is time for us to give our children what
they want.
Children and young adults in the middle class are not the only
ones seeking stable marriages. New data from the Fragile
Families Initiative, funded by the Ford Foundation and
conducted by noted researchers Sara McLanahan and Irving
Garfinkel, suggests that at the time of the child's birth,
two-thirds of low-income, unwed couples want -- and expect --
to get married.
The problem is that many, if not most, of these low-income
couples do not go on to get married. But that may be as
much our fault as their's, for our reluctance even to
bring up the topic of marriage sends the not-so-subtle
message that marriage is neither expected nor valued. The wonder is
not that so few go on to get married, but that some
actually do.
The point is this: Marriage is good for children, it is good
for adults, and it is good for communities. Although
not all marriages are perfect and some are downright
disastrous, marriage, on average, is the most stable
and healthy environment within which to bear and raise
children.
Perhaps we can break through our cultural reluctance to
embrace marriage as the ideal, by focusing our efforts
on helping children and youths develop the skills
necessary to form and sustain healthy, stable marriages. I'm
confident that is something every parent, including divorced and
unwed parents, wants for their own children.
_______________
Dr. Wade F. Horn is President of the National Fatherhood
Initiative, a clinical child psychologist, and co-author of
several books on parenting including the Better Homes and
Gardens New Father Book (Meredith, 1998) and the Better
Homes and Gardens New Teen Book (Meredith, 1999). Send your
comments to: The National Fatherhood Initiative, One Bank Street,
Suite 160, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, or e-mail him at
Gaithersburg, MD 20878, or e-mail him at NFI1995@aol.com.
Back to Smart Marriages Articles and
Information Page
Smart Marriages/CMFCE Home Page